|
october/november 2007 News
Special Section
Other Departments President's page
|
||
Spanish regions gain powerAutonomous communities and municipalities take on more responsibilities
REUTERS/Gustau Nacarino
Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero (r.) helps José Montilla campaign for president of the region of Catalonia in October 2006. Montilla was elected.
In Spain, the contest between the central government and the country's 17 regional governments can become volatile. The debate reached a fever pitch in mid-2007 with regard to Basque demands for greater autonomy, when opposition leader Mariano Rajoy of the Popular Party accused Prime Minister José Luis Rodràguez Zapatero of having negotiated with Basque ETA terrorists 'behind the backs of the Spanish people and playing with the structure of the state as if it was a Meccano set.' Yet according to popular opinion polls in August 2007, Zapatero's popularity has actually gone up since the ETA cancelled the cease-fire on June 6. No country has moved toward an intergovernmental system as rapidly as Spain in recent decades. Shortly after the death of Spanish dictator Francisco Franco in 1975, democracy was restored and the political system became federal in virtually all but name, bringing autonomy to regional and local governments, with powers divided between the central authority and 17 regional governments, called 'autonomous communities' in Spain. The division of jurisdiction has evolved through framework laws, Spain's Constitutional Tribunal and day-to-day intergovernmental relations. Ambitious subnational leaders have mainly sought further decentralization and devolution of powers to autonomous community and local levels. Besides its 17 autonomous communities, in 2005 Spain had 50 super-municipal provinces (seven merged with autonomous communities), 81 county-level entities, 8,107 cities or municipal corporations, 909 consortia (vertical partnerships between municipalities, provinces, autonomous communities and the state), 988 intermunicipal services and about 3,700 sub-municipal units and government corporations. Many joint bodies made up of representatives from the central government and autonomous community bodies have evolved through transfer of powers and concurrent programming. Spain's entry into the European Union in 1986 has affected policy in such areas as land use, solid waste disposal, coastal zone management, employment and immigration. How governments interact Macro IGR. This form of interaction includes issues of regional strife, usually involving identity, powers or financing, which attract attention outside Spain. As well, regional parties often negotiate deals in the central parliament when forming coalition governments. Political conflict always draws attention, and these struggles are significant and do define IGR, to some extent. But broader concerns of territorial politics come into play. Meso IGR. Spain's extensive interlocking arrangements - with central framework laws complemented by further legislation and regulation in the communities - means that both orders of government have strong interest in the implementation process in many areas. Spain's system of parliamentary and cabinet government permits much of this activity to be conducted within the executive branches by administrators and contacts with their counterparts are extensive. At the political level of ministers and heads of government, Spain has less contact than in such parliamentary federations as Australia, Canada and India. However, a Council of Autonomous Community Presidents was recently formed and it has biannual meetings with the prime minister; these focus on broad policy design, leaving other issues primarily to bilateral contacts. 
REUTERS/Vincent West
A representative of Batasuna, the illegal Basque independence party, speaks at a news conference in San Sebastian in September.
Policy design issues are also important in generating IGR at the meso level. For example, the rules of urban planning and zoning are only broadly regulated by Madrid. Each autonomous community has its own laws dealing with urban development, permits, construction and regulations. Each municipality is required to file and update a 10-year plan for development, approved by the autonomous community, including exceptions that are allowed. The same planning and operational processes are applicable to autonomous community-local affairs in terms of providing infrastructure, social services, income maintenance, health services and education. In all these areas, middle-level intergovernmental issues have largely shifted from Madrid-autonomous community to autonomous community-local government. As a result, more of the 'action' in a number of these areas focuses on the autonomous community capitals. Mayors and their councillors negotiate with regional agencies over matters such as financing and policy interpretation, review and approval. Similarly, the main public interest organization for governmental units, the Spanish Federation of Municipalities and Provinces, relies more on lobbying by its autonomous community-level affiliates, along with the autonomous-community-level advocacy of its non-affiliated counterpart associations in the Basque Country and in Catalonia. Micro IGR. This level, not seen by the public, includes the negotiating of projects, enforcing of standards and management of contracts. Many small Spanish municipalities do not have the population and revenue base to offer the full array of such required services as water and waste-water handling, refuse collection, access roads and sanitation. They have three choices if they do not directly deliver each service: allow the provincial government to provide the service, form a special district with nearby municipalities to deliver the services or arrange a service contract with another municipal government or a private vendor. Each of these types of arrangement is intergovernmental in nature and all require autonomous community approval. Municipalities engage in interactions with autonomous community education officials on such matters as sites for new schools. Where governments meet The building of Spain's 'State of Autonomous Regions' (Estado de las Autonómias) has depended heavily on these four types of agreements and commissions. Fiscal links are also fundamental in a system that is vertically unbalanced. The latest studies reveal that 'own source taxes' - taxes imposed locally - of autonomous communities in 2005 amounted to only 0.9 per cent of all revenues. The autonomous communities receive 50.3 per cent of their revenues as a fixed share of various taxes levied by the central government on their behalf. They receive another 46 per cent in the form of various transfer payments from the central budget (apart from the special fiscal regime for the Basque and Navarre autonomous communities). Municipalities fare somewhat better, inasmuch as direct and indirect taxes, charges and fees, and other revenue sources in 2002 amounted to about 65 per cent of local revenues. Another 13 per cent comes from state transfers, and the remainder from provincial and autonomous community transfers. Only a portion of these are unconditional, and the others are dependent on completion of specific projects. Forces that drive intergovernmental relations |
Robert Agranoff is Professor Emeritus in the School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University-Bloomington and Senior Professor, Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gasset, Madrid. He is completing a book on Spanish intergovernmental relations.
|
|
| Reviewed October 3, 2007 by Shannon Elliot | Return to Top | Privacy Policies |
